Driveless Car Startup Aurora Innovation Inc. Gets Backing from Volkswagen and Hyundai

Tim Higgins reported earlier this month at The Wall Street Journal Online that, “In the race to develop driverless cars, Volkswagen AG and Hyundai Motor Co. are placing bets on a Silicon Valley startup founded a year ago by the former leaders of autonomous vehicles at Google and Tesla.

“Aurora Innovation Inc. on Thursday announced separate partnerships with the two auto makers, signaling the emergence of a potential rival to Waymo, the Google self-driving experiment that has morphed into a business unit of corporate parent Alphabet Inc.

“The young Palo Alto, Calif., startup has a pedigree of driverless-car experts but is no surefire bet, with only about a year under its belt. The support of two of the largest car companies could help propel Aurora in a nascent industry that is working to upend the future of personal transportation.”

The Journal article noted that, “Executives from both VW and Hyundai said in interviews that they aim to put Aurora’s self-driving software in production vehicles by 2021.

“Aurora is using a mixture of robotics and machine learning to create vision systems and driving policy programs that allow computers to pilot a car without people behind the wheel, as well as developing how those systems would work with lasers, radar and cameras to see and navigate the world.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Start-up Company Law | Comments closed

Proposed Legislation Helps Farmers in Chapter 11 Battles

DTN writer Todd Neeley reported today that, “On Oct. 11, 2008, one of the nation’s largest ethanol producers, VeraSun Energy, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The action left thousands of farmers who sold corn to the South Dakota company’s ethanol plants at a loss.

“What compounded those losses, attorney Joseph A. Peiffer said, is the producers he represented were faced with VeraSun filing bankruptcy in the state of its incorporation, Delaware.

“Though legal, the move by VeraSun left many Iowa farmers facing the prospects of having to fight a legal battle in a distant state. This made it costly and logistically difficult for farmers to succeed.”

The DTN article explained that, “Peiffer, now a shareholder in Ag and Business Legal Strategies based in Hiawatha, Iowa, has drawn the attention of Washington lawmakers who next week are set to introduce a bill in the United States Senate that would forbid companies from filing bankruptcy in states of their incorporations.”

Mr. Neeley added that, “Sens. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., are set to introduce the Bankruptcy Venue Reform Act of 2018 next week.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

FoodMaven, a Startup to Cut Food Waste, Gets Backing from Walton Family

Bloomberg writer Craig Giammona reported earlier this week that, “Members of the Walton family, heirs to the Wal-Mart Stores Inc. fortune, are backing a startup that thinks it can turn a profit by reducing food waste.

“The business, called FoodMaven, has completed an $8.6 million Series A fundraising round that includes financing from the billionaire Walton clan. The family office is Walton Enterprises, which holds nearly half of Wal-Mart’s stock.

“The Colorado-based startup, which went live in July 2016, is creating a marketplace to find buyers for food that has been rejected by retailers, for any number of reasons, but is still good to eat. An estimated $200 billion worth of food is wasted in the U.S. each year — largely the result of a food system this is inflexible, according to Patrick Bultema, chief executive officer of the company.”

The Bloomberg article stated that, “FoodMaven currently has about 700 customers in Colorado, including restaurants, hospitals and large institutional cafeterias.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Start-up Company Law | Comments closed

New Tax Law Gives Cooperatives an Edge over Competitors

Jacob Bunge and Richard Rubin reported yesterday at The Wall Street Journal Online that, “The new U.S. tax law has placed Rick Tronson, a North Dakota grain-company operator, in a precarious position by unexpectedly bestowing big benefits on his main competitors.

“A provision inserted into the tax code during Senate and House negotiations in December gave farmers more lucrative deductions when they sell agricultural products directly to the farm cooperatives he competes against rather than to businesses like his own.

“Mr. Tronson, whose four storage facilities handle 17 million bushels of grain a year, said the competition could spell the end of his 76-year-old family-owned business.”

Bunge and Rubin explained that, “Farm groups and agricultural cooperatives battled last year to preserve a deduction on domestic U.S. production, which manufacturers also received. That deduction went away in the tax rewrite, but lawmakers including Sen. John Hoeven (R., N.D.) won the inclusion of a new deduction.

“The new provision allows farmers to deduct up to 20% of their total sales to cooperatives, letting some farmers reduce their taxable income to zero. It is a more generous version of a deduction that owners of pass-through businesses, such as partnerships and S-corporations, get in the law.

“Farmers would get a smaller deduction—about 20% of income—if they sell grain or other farm products to privately held or investor-owned companies like Mr. Tronson’s.”

Yesterday’s Wall Street Journal article added that, “Tax lawyers and accountants said the new law will give cooperatives a significant edge over competitors. That stands to benefit co-op giants including American Crystal Sugar Co., Land O’Lakes Inc., CHS Inc. and Ocean Spray Cranberries Inc.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Lawsuit Against Wall-Mart Over Organic Eggs

Reuters writer Tom Polansek reported yesterday that, “Wal-Mart Stores Inc misled U.S. shoppers by selling organic eggs laid by hens raised in enclosed structures under package labels that said the birds had access to the outdoors, a federal lawsuit alleged on Monday.

“The suit highlights uncertainty among consumers about production practices in the $500 million organic egg industry, farmers said, after the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) last month shelved plans to spell out for the first time what it means for birds to have access to the outdoors.

“Wal-Mart sells cartons of eggs to shoppers at a premium under its Organic Marketside brand with labels saying the eggs came from hens with ‘outdoor access,’ according to the lawsuit filed by a customer.”

Mr. Polansek indicated that, “Wal-Mart said it had not reviewed the allegations, but was taking them seriously.

“‘We hold our suppliers to high standards and are committed to providing our customers the quality products they expect,’ spokesman Randy Hargrove said.

“Representatives of Cal-Maine, which is the biggest U.S. egg producer and also named in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Investors Questioning Viability of Meal-kit Startups

Heather Haddon reported yesterday at The Wall Street Journal Online that, “Investors are losing their appetite for meal kits.

“Just a few years ago, the business of delivering packages containing premeasured ingredients that people assembled into meals was a novel one, drawing hundreds of millions of dollars from venture capitalists and other investors.

“Now, many are questioning the viability of meal-kit startups given logistical hurdles, the high cost of attracting and retaining customers and the arrival of often bigger rivals.”

“Once-Hungry Investors Pass on Meal-Kit Startups,” by Heather Haddon. The Wall Street Journal Online (January 8, 2018).

The Journal article explained that, “An estimated 70% of customers of Blue Apron Holdings Inc., the largest such provider, stop regularly buying its meals six months after signing up, while more than 80% of HelloFresh S.E users weren’t active, according to Daniel McCarthy, an Emory University professor who researches meal kits and other subscription services.”

Ms. Haddon noted that, “Early investor enthusiasm helped pave the way for the initial public offerings of Blue Apron and HelloFresh last year. But investors have become more cautious. Last year, around $274 million was invested in 18 meal-kit companies, down from a peak of 25 deals worth $308 million in 2015, according to data provider PitchBook Data, Inc.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Start-up Company Law | Comments closed

Investors Ploughed at least $700m into Agricultural Tech Companies in 2017

Chloe Cornish reported today at The Financial Times Online that, “More money went into funding agricultural technology start-ups last year than the previous two combined, as battle lines were drawn between traditional ‘big ag’ companies and some of the Silicon Valley venture capitalists looking to upend the multibillion-dollar industry.

“Investors ploughed more than $700m into agricultural tech companies in 2017, according to research firm CB Insights, a big step up compared with the $332m and $233m invested in 2016 and 2015 respectively.

“The spending splurge on start-ups using robotics or data science to make farming more efficient contrasts with the straitened financial situation in rural America.”

The FT article noted that, “The significant late-stage capital increases suggest the ag tech sector is maturing, says Rob LeClerc, co-founder and chief executive of AgFunder, a specialist research company. He points to a $203m series D fundraising round closed last month by Indigo Ag, a Boston company that wants to use microbes to improve plant health and crop yields.

“But some start-ups are aiming more directly at making pricing for essential commodities such as seeds and fertilisers more transparent from the ‘big ag’ industry.

“Nearly one quarter of 2017’s ag tech investments were made by corporations or their venture capital arms, including those of giants Monsanto and Syngenta, up 7 percentage points from 2016 — raising a question about whether ‘big ag’ will be friend or foe to the industry’s disrupters.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Start-up Company Law | Comments closed

For-Profit Urban Farm in Des Moines City Limits

Brian Taylor Carlson reported on the front page of today’s Des Moines Register that, “Jenny Quiner pulls back giant tarps to check the fragile lettuces growing in her high tunnel greenhouse. Rows of perky green lettuces sprout from the ground. She recovers them, then steps outside into the frigid winter to check on the cover crops in the fields that protect and enrich the soil.

“The scene looks like most any other vegetable farm you would see across Iowa. But there’s one significant difference: It’s in the middle of a residential neighborhood.

“Dogpatch Urban Gardens is the only for-profit farm in Des Moines city limits — the realization of one of Quiner’s dreams.”

Des Moines Register Front Page (Friday, January 5, 2018).

Today’s article explained that, “From the street, the property looks like any other residence. But a closer look reveals a farm stand, a high tunnel greenhouse, signage and meticulous garden plots, with rows of a variety of produce.”

The Register article noted that, “In only two years, Quiner has become a leader in the Des Moines food scene, says Jordan Clasen, owner of Grade A Gardens in Johnston.

“Her produce was instantly recognized for its quality, which opened the door to placing it in local restaurants. Quiner opened a retail space on the farm in May, which includes her produce and some products from other farms. She’s also launching a subscription service — a community-supported agriculture program — which gives subscribers access to weekly produce.”

Mr. Carlson added that, “What Quiner has done at Dogpatch has helped her capture the imagination of other local farmers and inspire innovation.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Arkansas Plant Board Stands By Dicamba Ban

Associated Press writer Andrew Demillo reported yesterday that, “Arkansas regulators stood by their plan Wednesday to ban an herbicide that farmers in several states say has drifted onto their crops and caused damage, despite a request from lawmakers to reconsider the restriction and a lawsuit by a maker of the weed killer.

“The state Plant Board again voted in favor of its proposal to ban the use of dicamba from April 16 through Oct. 31. The proposed ban is scheduled to go before a legislative panel later this month.

“Lawmakers in December delayed considering the ban and asked the board to consider a new cutoff date based on scientific evidence and potentially a dividing line based on geography in the state. The 11-3 vote in favor of the ban Wednesday came after the board’s pesticide committee discussed the reasons for the cutoff dates and recommended sticking with the proposal.”

The AP article added that, “Republican Sen. Bill Sample, who had called for delaying a vote on the ban last month, said he backed the ban after hearing the committee discuss the reasons behind it.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Agricultural Implications of the New Tax Law

An update posted today at the Delta Farm Press Online indicated that, “Farm Credit East tax experts have reviewed the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act — the largest overhaul of the U.S. tax code in 30 years. ‘Overall, the new tax provisions will provide significant benefits to Northeast farmers,’ says Dario Arezzo, Farm Credit East senior tax consultant. ‘However, certain provisions will unfortunately limit the value for some producers.'”

Here are a few of the highlights from today’s Delta Farm Press article:

• Alternative minimum tax. The AMT still remains for individuals, but exemption amounts are significantly increased and will be indexed for inflation.

• State and local tax deductions. SALT deductions for state and local property plus income or sales taxes are limited to $10,000 annually.

• Section 179. Beginning with the 2018 tax year, farmers will be allowed to immediately write off capital purchases such as breeding livestock, farm equipment and single-purpose structures (such as milking parlors) up to $1 million. The phase out on this expensing provision doesn’t kick in until a farm reaches $2.5 million in purchases.

• Bonus depreciation. Farmers will be able to write off 100% of qualified property purchased after Sept. 27, 2017 through 2022 (at which point a phase-down occurs). The new law expands bonus depreciation to include new and used property purchased or constructed, and to plants bearing fruits and nuts.

• Section 199 repealed, replaced. The Domestic Production Activities Deduction has been repealed. As a result, many cooperatives accelerated that pass-through deduction to patrons before the end of 2017.

Ag and horticultural cooperatives will have a new 20% deduction. It’ll be beneficial for reducing cooperative income. However, unlike the DPAD, this is taken at the cooperative levels and isn’t directly passed on to patrons.

• Estate tax. The federal estate tax exemption rates double to $11.2 million per individual ($22.4 million for married couples) in 2018.

• Breweries, distilleries and wineries. Alcohol manufacturers will enjoy a two-year excise tax reduction. The credit against the wine excise tax was also expanded, and sparkling wine producers are included.

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed