EPA Evaluating Year-Round E15 Use

DTN writer Todd Neeley reported yesterday that, “The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency continues to look at whether it can approve the use of E15 year-round, EPA’s Administrator Scott Pruitt said on Tuesday during his first appearance before the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

“As members of Congress continue to explore possible reform to the Renewable Fuel Standard and amid pressure from petroleum refiners to waive RFS requirements, the expansion of the E15 market continues to be a top priority for the ethanol industry.

“Allowing year-round E15 sales would bolster demand for corn, and as a result, would boost markets for other feedstocks used for cellulosic ethanol and other advanced biofuels.”

Mr. Neeley explained that, “Federal law currently forbids the sale of E15 from June 1 to Sept. 15. The ethanol industry continues to push for EPA to extend the waiver for Reid Vapor Pressure, or RVP, to E15. Currently, E15 sales are restricted in nearly two-thirds of the country during the summer months because of ozone concerns.”

The DTN article added that, “Brian Jennings, CEO of the American Coalition for Ethanol, said his group was encouraged by Pruitt’s testimony.

“‘ACE members are grateful Administrator Pruitt is committed to completing the review of EPA’s legal authority to provide RVP relief for E15 and higher blends and that he reiterated the agency’s interest in how high-octane fuels can meet fuel efficiency standards,’ Jennings said in a statement.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Nebraska to Follow Federal EPA on Dicamba, Won’t Go as Far as Other States

Nebraska won’t go as far as other states and ban or limit use of a controversial weedkiller this year.

“But farmers here will have to follow new federal restrictions and have special training, or hire someone who has had it, if they want to use the herbicide dicamba to control weeds in soybean fields.

“The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is closely watching how American farmers use dicamba during the 2018 growing season. If problems persist, the agency could ban certain forms of its use in the future — something farmers hope to avoid in their ongoing battle with weeds.”

Ms. Soderlin noted that, “In addition to the training, the EPA is also requiring farmers to keep records on dicamba application and to apply the chemical at only certain times of day and on days that are not windy.

“If problems continue, the EPA may not allow dicamba on growing crops after this year.

“That would be a blow to the seed companies and to farmers, who say they need dicamba because some weeds have evolved to tolerate another popular herbicide, glyphosate, the key ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup brand weedkiller.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Startup Shares Social Media Posts With Financial Representatives

Sarah Hauer reported yesterday at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Online that, “If you bought a house, were expecting a child or started a new job, you would most likely share it on Facebook, Instagram or LinkedIn.

“What if a financial adviser could see those posts on social networks? Those life events often tie to important financial decisions.

“A new startup, Socialeads, is developing a way to pull information from social networking websites to help financial representatives know when and how to make connections with clients.”

Ms. Hauer noted that, “Socialeads, founded by Larry Hitchcock and Matthew Salzer, is the first investment for Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co.’s Cream City Venture Capital fund, which started last year. The startup will receive up to $85,000 in seed funding through the partnership.”

The Journal Sentinel article added that, “The idea is to have a platform that can recognize the content and context of a post on social media and provide insights into what action from a financial representative would be appropriate.

“‘There are moments in time when people are more apt to think about financial products,’ Hitchcock said. ‘Machine learning is how our platform will get more accurate and provide insights that enable everyone to understand moments in time with each client.'”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law, Start-up Company Law | Comments closed

Midwest Women in Ag Conference Set

A news release last week from Purdue University indicated that, “Presentations by Jason Henderson, director of Purdue Extension, and Katie Dilse, a dynamic motivational speaker noted for her work in the agricultural industry, are among the highlights of the 2018 Midwest Women in Agriculture Conference, Feb. 20-22 at the Horizon Convention Center in Muncie.

“This year’s agenda is one of the most ambitious in conference history, covering a wide range of timely, critical issues for women in all sectors of the agricultural industry, said Courtney Stierwalt, county director of Purdue Extension-Fountain County and one of the conference organizers.

“‘Attendees leave the conference with new information and networks that in turn become vital resources for their operations,’ Stierwalt said. ‘It does not matter if you are just starting out or have decades of experience. This conference has something for every participant.'”

The release stated that, “For more information or to sign up, go to the conference website at https://ag.purdue.edu/extension/WIA/Pages/default.aspx.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Michigan Mega-Farmer Faces Fraud Charges

DTN writer Todd Neeley reported on Friday that, “Michael Stamp, the former owner of Decatur, Michigan-based Stamp Farms LLC, and two of his associates have been indicted on 14 counts of conspiracy to commit bank fraud and making false statements to attain loans and crop insurance, according to an indictment unsealed by a federal district court. A grand jury handed down the indictment on Dec. 13.

“Stamp Farms filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in November 2012 after Wells Fargo initiated action against Stamp on June 30, 2012. The bank found Stamp Farms in noncompliance on loan agreements, including working capital and other ratios.

“The indictment, which was unsealed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan on Jan. 18, also names James Leonard Becraft, Jr., and Douglas Edward Diekman as co-conspirators.”

The DTN article noted that, “According to court documents in Stamp’s individual bankruptcy case, Wells Fargo claimed it had made a $68 million loan in December 2011 based on representations that Stamp Farms and its affiliates farmed 46,000 acres. Audits later could uncover only about 27,000 acres, the bank claimed.”

Mr. Neeley added that, “Starting in 2011, the indictment said, Stamp needed money to keep his farm going and to pay off an outstanding loan. Between March and December, the grand jury alleges, Stamp provided false information to obtain about $68 million in credit from Wells Fargo. He did so, the indictment said, by misrepresenting the amount of land he farmed and the value of his farming assets.

“When the bank extended his credit, the indictment said, Stamp continued to provide false information about his operation. In addition, the grand jury said Stamp submitted false claims to the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation in order to get crop insurance payments.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Tech Startups Address Food Waste Issues

Anne Kadet indicated yesterday at The Wall Street Journal Online that, “Forget Bitcoin or shares of Amazon.com. My current market obsession is the wild swings in the price of the pu pu platter for two at Lichee Nut, the Chinese restaurant in my Brooklyn neighborhood.

“While diners who order at the restaurant pay $16.50 for the platter, folks using Gebni, an app offering dynamic, demand-based pricing on deliveries from several hundred restaurants around the city see different rates throughout the day.

“On a Sunday afternoon, the platter price sank to $12.44 before climbing to $13.21 using the Gebni app. The next day, the price started at $14.86, dropped to $12.43 by midafternoon and shot up to $15.01 in time for dinner.”

The Journal article noted that, “Gebni is one of several local startups trying to solve a continuing logistical dilemma: There is likely enough prepared food to affordably feed everyone in New York, but a lot winds up in the dumpster.

“‘The food waste problem is a big issue. We need a whole bunch of startups coming together to try to solve it,’ says Mohamed Merzouk, the co-founder and chief executive officer of Gebni.

“Gebni’s discounts, which depend on both overall order demand and demand for specific dishes, range up to 35%. But customers never pay more than a restaurant’s standard menu price. ‘We do the reverse of surge pricing,’ says Mr. Merzouk.”

Ms. Kadet added that, “Given all the grub that winds up in the garbage, there’s plenty of room for growth, says [Transfernation, a not-for-profit startup, has its network of independent contractors—often Uber and Lyft drivers who are already on the streets—pick up leftover food for delivery to the nearest shelter, co-founder Hannah Dehradunwala], who estimates 30,000 to 35,000 pounds of prepared food hits the city’s trash stream each day. ‘We have enough food. Really great food. The only issue is to get it to where it can be used quickly.'”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Start-up Company Law | Comments closed

Waters of the U.S.: U.S. Supreme Court Rules District Courts Proper Venue

DTN writer Todd Neeley reported earlier this week that, “The national stay on the 2015 waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule is expected to be lifted following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling Monday that any legal challenges to the rule must take place in federal district courts and not at the appellate level.

“However, that doesn’t necessarily mean the previous administration’s rule will take effect. That’s because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposed a rule to put the brakes on the WOTUS rule prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling, putting in place a two-year delay on the effective date while EPA undertakes a broader rewrite.

“EPA spokesperson Liz Bowman offered the following statement on the Supreme Court decision: ‘The Trump administration saw this decision coming and put a plan in place to level the playing field and ensure certainty for states and regulated community. The Trump administration’s stay of the 2015 WOTUS rule will very likely be complete before any change in court jurisdiction can be finalized, or the Obama administration’s overreaching definition of WOTUS can be implemented.'”

Mr. Neeley explained that, “The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati issued a national stay of the rule in response to lawsuits across the country and lingering questions about the rule’s legality.

“Agriculture, other industry groups, and state governments across the country alleged the Obama administration’s rule expanded federal jurisdiction to waters not traditionally protected by the Clean Water Act. Even prior to the completion of the rule, farmers and ranchers faced uncertainty as to which waters were considered jurisdictional. So far, neither Congress nor the EPA has been able to make the law more understandable.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

Report Notes More Farmers May Seek Chapter 12 in 2018

DTN writer Todd Neeley reported yesterday that, “More farmers likely will be filing Chapter 12 bankruptcy in 2018, as they continue to struggle with costs of production exceeding commodity prices, ag lender CoBank said in a new report.

“The CoBank report, ‘Forces that will shape the U.S. rural economy in 2018,’ said commodity price depression from surpluses around the world will make for another belt-tightening year for farmers who will continue to see working capital diminish.

“As a result, CoBank said, more producers are likely to turn to Chapter 12.”

Mr. Neeley also noted that, “The number of Chapter 12 filings has been on the rise since 2014, according to CoBank. There were about 380 filings in 2014. That number spiked to just more than 500 in 2017, according to the report.”

“Chapter 12 is designed specifically for farmers with regular annual income and allows them to stop debt collection and establish repayment plans of three to five years with creditors. The law also allows farmers to restructure debt without forming creditors’ committees,” the DTN article said.

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed

USDA Organic Livestock Rule Creates Rift in the Farm Community

Rick Barrett reported yesterday at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Online that, “A Trump administration decision aimed at scrapping higher animal welfare standards for organic poultry and meats, has created a rift in the farm community.

“At issue, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has withdrawn its support for a rule that would have, among other things, required more outdoor space for hens on organic egg farms.

“The rule would have closed a loophole in the current regulations that allows large poultry farms to use screened-in porches as outdoor access. It also would have prohibited some practices such as ‘tail docking’ where a cow’s tail is partially removed.”

The article stated that, “‘With USDA’s wise decision to withdraw this rule, organic livestock and poultry producers can rest assured that they will not be forced out of business by another costly and burdensome regulation,’ Senate Agriculture Chairman Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said in a statement.”

The Journal Sentinel article added that, “Yet some of the rule’s strongest supporters are in the $43 billion organic food industry, where Wisconsin is second only to California in production.

“Consumers expect higher animal welfare standards from organic agriculture, said John Brunnquell, founder and president of Egg Innovations that has a farm in Cedar Grove, north of Port Washington.

“‘This is about consumer confidence,’ Brunnquell said, adding that most people who buy organic eggs believe the chickens have access to the outdoors, fresh air, sunshine and a natural diet of things like bugs and worms.”

Posted in Agriculture Law | Comments closed

Financial Firms Turn to Quick, Drive-By Home Valuations

Wall Street Journal writers Ryan Dezember and Peter Rudegeair reported today that, “When Blackstone Group LP wanted to borrow hundreds of millions of dollars to buy foreclosed homes after the housing crash, it needed a quick, inexpensive way to value thousands of houses the investment firm already owned and was offering as collateral.

“Blackstone and its lender, Deutsche Bank AG, settled on a sort of drive-by valuation done by real-estate agents that are more cursory and cost far less than traditional appraisals.

“Congress outlawed the use of such assessments, called broker price opinions, or BPOs, to value properties for traditional mortgages. But the prohibition, enacted as part of postcrash financial regulation, doesn’t apply to investors buying tens of thousands of houses.”

The Journal writers noted that, “Now these perfunctory valuations abound, underpinning tens of billions of dollars of home deals. Sometimes the process is outsourced to India, where companies charge real-estate agents a few dollars to come up with U.S. home values by consulting Google Earth and real-estate websites.”

Today’s article explained that, “BPOs have been used to value collateral in the more than $20 billion of bonds sold by institutional landlords, such as Blackstone’s Invitation Homes Inc., and in the fast-growing business of lending to individual house flippers. Banks request them when considering whether to foreclose or negotiate repayment plans with delinquent homeowners.

“Their popularity shows how Wall Street is finding ways to adapt to government efforts to crack down on some of the excesses that contributed to the housing crisis. Critics say BPOs are ill-suited to gauge home values and could leave debtholders with less collateral than they thought. Properties worth less than their debt could result in losses for investors, while inaccurate price information might misguide a lender in a foreclosure process.”

Posted in Agriculture Law, General Interest, Real Estate Law | Comments closed